Notice: Undefined index: options in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 194
Covid's impact on existing contracts

As a Business Owner, where do you stand if you have contracts with others in this current climate?

profile photo placeholder


By Amanda Hamilton, CEO of National Association of Licensed Paralegals (NALP)

We are going through unprecedented times, meaning that most of us (if not all of us) have not experienced the kind of situation that we are facing now. It is therefore important to know where you stand contractually and what legal implications there may be if you cannot provide services to others or they cannot provide services to you that are contractually bound to be fulfilled.

Firstly, as with all contracts, they have to be legally enforceable agreements. Many people believe that to be legally enforceable, a contract must be in writing. This is not the case for simple contracts, although there are a few exceptions such as contracts for the sale of land or property which must be in writing.

However, generally, we make verbal contracts all the time without knowing it. For example, going on public transport. As soon as we make the payment, using whatever prescribed method, the transport company has a contract with us to get us to our destination safely and within a reasonable time. We are not asked to sign a contract every time we go on the bus, train or tube! It is nevertheless deemed to be a valid contract. If something happens, e.g. a long delay, then we have recourse and can claim compensation.

If you believe you have a verbal contract with someone else, anything that infers this, e.g. an action taken by you which you would not have considered unless there had been a contract in place, or an email trail mentioning certain matters where the only conclusion is that there was a legally binding agreement, is sufficient evidence. You may also have incurred costs. For example, Bill telephones you and asks you to paint his shed on Saturday. You agree to do this and discuss, colour, time and a fee to do so. You promptly go out and buy the paint, but when you arrive at the designated time on Saturday, Bill says that he has changed his mind. You have incurred costs in buying the paint and brushes but Bill refuses to reimburse you saying that it was just a friendly request and there was no intention to create a legally binding agreement. This is not the case. Why else would you have bought the paint and why else would you have turned up at this particular time?

But what would happen if there is a valid contract which cannot be fulfilled because of some outside influence that is unforeseen. For example, the situation we currently find ourselves in where changes to our everyday routines are not only being chosen (for safety reasons) but are also being forced upon us through no fault of either party to the contract. For example: a car manufacturer who is contractually bound to distribute a certain number of vehicles to a retailer but who cannot fulfil this because his factory workers cannot go to work as they are self-isolating, and this is a Government Directive that neither party foresaw at the time of making the contract.

Can the retailer sue the manufacturer for compensation? The answer is, probably not as the contract will be deemed to have been frustrated. Frustration is a doctrine in English Contract Law and is defined as an unforeseen event that renders the contractual obligations impossible to perform thereby relieving the parties of their legal obligations. It excuses non-performance and automatically discharges (terminates) the contract. The only exception to this is where the circumstances may have been foreseeable and therefore avoided, and it is not applicable to certain contracts such as insurance policies.

However, some contracts may have a particular clause added in, which is known as a Force Majeure’ clause. This covers relief from liability if certain events take place making it impossible to fulfil your obligations under a contract. However, the circumstances where ‘Force Majeure’ clauses will kick in have to be specifically identified and they usually cover unforeseen events which may be referred to as ‘act of God’ such things as floods, storms, weather permutations, war, explosions etc.

In some cases, these clauses may also include compliance with Government rules, directives, regulations or laws or other situations, or may specifically mention other circumstances that may affect the supply of goods and services.
If however, there is no ‘Force Majeure’ clause in the contract, then the party against whom the contract is being enforced, may have to fall back on the doctrine of frustration, which is a ‘common law’ doctrine. This means that there may be no legislation or statute referring to this doctrine, but there have been numerous court cases where the court has decided whether or not frustration applies. It is therefore dependent on the circumstances of each individual case.
So, in conclusion, if you have a clear contract with a client and you can still, despite the current circumstances, fulfil the services, then both you and client are contractually obligated to do so, and the client is obligated to receive those services and pay for them. That said, if your client can no longer make use of the service or product due to the current situation, then you may decide not to enforce the contract, but rather discuss with them a way to carry it over to better times. This will be a decision each individual business owner needs to make as they consider the future of their business and business relationships.
If you are a client and you wish to cancel your contract with a supplier due to the COVID19 virus, then you need first to check if the supplier can actually deliver on the contract — if they can’t, then ‘frustration’ may apply. If they can, then you’d need to look to the ‘Force Majeure’ clause to see if you can exit the contract on that basis. Beyond that, then you may well find that legally you are obligated to complete the contract and pay the full fees. If this is the case, then it is always best to speak to the supplier as soon as possible to try to find an amicable compromise.

In both cases, remember that almost every business is suffering right now, so finding a compromise that works for both parties, and recognises the pressure on both parties, will almost certainly be the best way forward — the last thing anyone needs right now is additional legal fees and court time (assuming the courts are open again).

Finally, in these very difficult times where many people rely on contracts with others to survive, it is absolutely vital that, as a business owner, you know where you stand and what may be the appropriate action to take. This is where a paralegal may assist you if you cannot afford the fees of a solicitor or barrister. A paralegal can also act as a mediator if you need an independent third party to negotiate between supplier and client.


Other news

Members Only, Webinar

What is it like working in the Probate Research Industry (Video)

Chantal, PR Director for the National Association of Licensed Paralegals discusses with Ryan Gregory what it is liking working as a paralegal in the Probate Research industry. Join us more.

Members Only, Webinar

How AI may impact the work of paralegals (Video)

Join the NALP team as they interview Robin Ghurbhurun and discuss the impact of AI and how it could impact the work that paralegals do on a day to more.

Members Only, Webinar

Working as a paralegal in the Defence Sector (Video)

Watch and listen as NALP member Yasmin Underwood talks about what it is like working as a paralegal in the Defence sector. Previous webinars can be seen on our more.


NALP webinar: Business Continuity (video)

Business Continuity is looking at how a business will cope in the event that something goes terribly wrong. This webinar goes through just how important business continuity is, particularly more.


What is the true impact of the virtual eradication of legal aid?

In April 2013 The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force. This statute introduced funding cuts to legal aid, resulting in fewer consumers more.