Simply Law Jobs | Why we should strive for an Inclusive Legal Services Sector

News

 

With Solicitors able to become solicitor-advocates and with barristers being able to register as direct access and being granted the right to conduct litigation, one could argue that there is virtually no difference anymore between the two professions – except, of course, that each has its own professional membership and regulatory body to protect their members’ interests. 

 

Somewhere in the last few decades, we have gone terribly wrong. The profession has got confused about what its function is. Our duty is to the prospective client, or the ‘consumer’ as we now tend categorise them, rather than to internalise everything for the betterment of our own profession, or to increase our profit margins and commercialise what we do

Continue Reading

Share

Other news

• Webinar, Members Only

From Paralegal to Solicitor, using the SQE

Robert Dudley from BARBRI joins us again to talk about the path to becoming a solicitor, if you are currently a paralegal and wish to further your career. Join us...read more.

• Uncategorized

Level 3 qualifications carry UCAS Tariff Points

NALP’s Level 3 qualifications are recognised by UCAS and therefore carry UCAS Tariff points.This means if you complete NALP’s Level 3 qualifications you earn UCAS points, which can be used...read more.

• Articles, Understanding the Law

Can you work in law without qualifying as a solicitor or barrister?

The short answer is, yes you can. And there is lots of potential and growth in this area too. Many consumers and businesses need legal help but may not be...read more.

• Articles, Member Articles

When a mistake becomes a life sentence

“Everyone deserves a second chance.” It sounds noble. But what does it truly mean in the real world – in law, in psychology, and in society? Imagine a person who...read more.

• Articles, News

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys

Guidance Sheet for NALP Members in relation to the High Court Judgment in the case of Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys (2025) This judgment is only relevant to one reserved...read more.